Why Feminism Destroys Nations

Been a little busy and haven’t posted in a long time. But I watched this fine video and feel like the creator must have read my Why The Patriarchy is Needed  article.

WOMEN DON’T DESTROY CIVILIZATIONS. FEMINISM DOES

Now first of all, I would disagree with his title, “Why Women Destroy Civilizations.” Women don’t destroy civilizations. They play a very prominent role in creating them. Creating people, supporting the men who are involved in the production/building of that civilization and so on. In fact, without the equal distribution of chaste and obedient wives, there would be little incentive for men to work together in the pursuit of creating civilization.

However, the caveat, is that when moral standards no longer apply to women, that is when the structure of a civilization will weaken and collapse.

ALL CIVILIZATIONS ARE PATRIARCHIES 

558319_472066699470041_93871768_n

As I argued in my article about Patriarchy, ALL civilizations throughout history, WITHOUT exception have been patriarchies. Whine about the oppression of the patriarchy all you want, but if you want the luxury of high end technology, along with the privilege to sleep in your house safely at night without fear of rape or murder – you should thank the patriarchy.

There are some patriarchies like that of Ancient Egypt and Ancient Persia that allowed women more rights than their counterparts in Ancient Rome and China. But these were soft patriarchies, where a majority of the power was still under male control, and where a majority of male citizens still had reproductive access to a wife who would be loyal to them.For instance, in Ancient Egypt, it was permissible for a woman to have several sexual relations before marriage and enjoy a degree of experimentation. But generally speaking, once that woman was married, the expectation of her sexual loyalty was so strong – that she would be put to death for adultery (yes, in sex positive pagan Egypt.) Whereas the worst punishment for male adultery was divorce and alimony payments.

 But for the most part, a civilization can only form when the males of that situation agree to get along, work together, and not fight one another. And the incentive for this behavior is the obedience and chastity of their women. While such a thing might sound horrible for women at the surface level, the fate of women in non-patriarchal societies has been to become the chattel or sex slaves of the more dominant, patriarchal societies that invade and conquer them. Yes, Celtic women in tribal Europe had a good deal of freedom. But they had lower life expectancies and higher fatalities in child bearing than the Roman, patriarchal women. Also, when the Romans invaded and conquered the Celtic cultures, many of these Celtic women were sold off into sex slavery, to be used and abused as commodities by numerous men, while Roman women enjoyed the safety and protection provided by their husbands, along with the sanitation, art, music, and advanced culture provided by a civilized society.

WOMEN BENEFIT FROM THE PATRIARCHY

womanKnight

The reality is that a woman who is a member of a functioning patriarchy receives protection from that patriarchy. While that woman’s marriage may not be ideal, it tends to be better than the fate of women in the conquered society.

The reality is that this world is one in which people either conquer or get conquered. The liberal, cuddly ideal of the “noble savage” or “nature” is a fairy tale. A fairy tale produced by elitist, mostly white people in Western societies who have never known what it means to survive the harsh trials of nature, who have never known what it means to live in a third world country, or oppressed society. While they talk out on the subject of “privilege,” these people have been incredibly privileged to live under the protection of the fading patriarchal societies that they are so quick to attack.The reason they sleep safely at night, is because there are men with guns ready to fight for their protection – men who are insulted and despised by the very people they protect.

THE CURRENT FALL OUT OF FEMINIST COUNTRIES

Activists from the women's rights organisation Femen shout slogans outside Notre-Dame de Paris Cathedral  in Paris

And now, as the creator of the video I posted (Black Pigeon) pointed out, countries like Sweden that were once on of the safest countries in the world are now called “the rape capital of Europe.” In places like Sweden and Germany, politicians cheer on the annihilation of their own people, their own way of life.

Now to be clear, I am not against diversity or immigration. I myself have bi-racial family members and friends. I have some good Muslim friends. Immigration is a good way to get new ideas into a society and to avoid stagnation. All powerful civilizations have had a degree of diversity. But immigration is a tool with which to improve the already existing society, not to annihilate it.

FEMINISM LEADS TO ATOMIZATION AND SOCIAL BREAK DOWN

But when the host society no longer cares for the preservation of their culture, tradition, or heritage, they will be the ones to assimilate and change for the oncoming, patriarchal, invasion force. And it is feminism that weakens the bonds of civilization and society. Because feminism does not care about the sacrifices necessary for the good of the majority. It cares about the atomization and liberation of the individual (specifically the female individual) to live in a way that requires no sacrifice, no sense of duty, or obligation to the very society that protects her. But instead encourages a behavior of entitlement and the celebration of victimhood. While second wave feminism was at least about female empowerment, today’s third wave feminism has become about embracing a status of victimhood and asking more what the government can do for you (rather than what you can do for it).

But is such liberation really liberation? Once the masculinity of the men in a society is eroded – who will protect these women? Or want to protect these women? As we saw in the disaster in Cologne Germany, crowds of women were attacked by a thousand men. And yet where were the German men when this happened? Where were the police? When women get attacked by immigrants in Russia – said immigrants wake up in the hospital. So the problem isn’t necessarily immigration. Russia has a larger Muslim population than most Western European countries.

And yet Russia is still a traditional, patriarchal society that has pride in their culture. Whereas many of the feminized Swedes and Germans now hate their culture (so much that they are cheering on its replacement)..as you will see in the video above.

MEN IN FEMINIST SOCIETIES NO LONGER CARE ABOUT PROTECTING WOMEN

Furthermore, after all these women were sexually assaulted, the German politicians responded by blaming the women for their own assault. In a feminist society, women are seen as men, and so they are seen as people who don’t need any special protections. So now, ironically enough, feminists are getting exactly what they have been asking for – and it’s not pretty. The feminist response to this contention is, “We don’t need men to protect us because we can protect ourselves.” And yet as we can see from the growth of rapes and attacks on women in Europe committed by immigrant men – this is clearly not the case.

FEMINISM CREATES A CLASS OF WOMEN NOT WORTH PROTECTING

The other truth is that feminism creates a class of women who are not worth protecting. I notice that some of the older men I know still practice chivalry. They open doors, offer their seat and even buy drinks for all women at the table – not in hopes of getting laid, but as a general token of respect. But most younger men these days do not do such things (unless they are hoping to get lucky). Chivalry is a logical behavior in a society where the protection and elevation of women is necessary, because women are the creators of children and supporters of men. But in a society where women do neither of these things, they are simply just smaller men. And if they are men – why not just let them protect themselves?

SOLUTIONS? 

601952_10152633920465038_390185553_n

The trouble with things like the video I posted is that the authors are very good at observing the problem, but they don’t really have a solution. So…just let everything fall apart? What’s the point of even making the video?

The only unified solution among younger men I’ve noticed is things like The Red Pill. However (and many people will get angry) I don’t think TRP is a long term solution. As many Red Pillers have said themselves, it’s simply an adaption strategy to the current social conditions, and it allows individual men to maximize their sexual opportunities in the current environment. This is kind of like, figuring out the maximum way to loot a store while a crime riot is going on, instead of stopping the riot. I also don’t feel like having sex with a bunch of random strangers is very personally or spiritually fulfilling (but maybe that’s just me).

I can sympathize with many of these guys. They feel like they have been betrayed and lied to by society (hence the name – Red Pill, as from the Matrix). Yes, that is true, society is lying to all of us, on multiple levels. But I feel like ideologies like TRP are simply a way to accelerate the demise of society – or to take advantage of it – rather than stopping it.

It also places an emphasis on the empowerment of the individual male, over the cohesive teamwork of many males working together.

I think if people want to save the future, the best thing people can do is band together to form a new system, a system that offers rewards for male participation, and starts more vocally questioning Feminism. After all, you can’t blame women entirely for Feminism. Feminism exists because men have allowed it to exist. They didn’t step forward to stop it, so now they have to deal with it.

Obviously we shouldn’t live in a society like Saudi Arabia where women are completely oppressed on every level. This leads to sexual perversion among men (since many can never be with a naked woman until they’re like 30, so they have sex with little boys).In order for a society to be functional, the protection and safety of women is important. The anti-feminist agenda also shouldn’t be about denying women access to safe birth control and abortion, because that’s just as bad for men as it is for women.

But we must realize that men and women are not the same. They can be complimentary, but they are not equal.

The anti-feminist agenda should be about stopping the wave of entitlement and victim celebration culture. It shouldn’t be men whining about their own victimhood. Nor should it be men sitting around and figuring out how they are going to loot the system and further its collapse. This is kind of like the venture Capitalists at the top of our system. They are not interested in building anything long lasting and sustainable, they just want to take as much as they can from the current system before it falls apart – like feeding off the blood of a dying patient in the hospital.

Solutions should be about building a society that works. Where there is balance between men and women. Where women earn protections and privileges, in exchange for loyalty and support. Some feminist goals like the punishment of rape and domestic violence, along with allowing women to pursue education and physical fitness are good for society. But the Third Wave promotion of promiscuity and the pussy pass should be put to an end. When a society hands out protections and privileges without expecting anything in return – that’s when things begin to fall apart. And it’s time for that to stop.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Why Feminism Destroys Nations

  1. “But the Third Wave promotion of promiscuity and the pussy pass should be put to an end.”

    Put to an end through education, and persuasion, and not force (the state). Invading hordes are only an issue in a disarmed society. “Gun free zones” will be the canaries.

    The idea of WGOTW, and creating their own society, would be an interesting experiment in humanity. I wonder if men as “second class citizens” could work, or if it would have to be made up almost entirely of women who’d rather live without men (& utilize semen donation?) than live “under” them.

    Lastly, I once heard of a virus, or something like it, spread through cats, in Brazil, resulting in more aggressive men, and more submissive women. I have no idea if this is true, and could be just a ridiculous rumor. Regardless, Brazil is largely a Christian nation with very masculine men. I can’t imagine that Brazil would tolerate much of the raping/killing of “infidels”. Maybe cats have a solution?

    Like

  2. Hi I love this post and your blog and I like how your pushing back against this liberal agenda. I was wondering, are you a girl or a guy?

    Like

      • you canot say it say it was mens fault because they let it happen because some women where already feminist because of the 2nd wave of feminism so when the 3rd was introduced they bought into thE lies and deceit of the new 3rd wave of feminism. MEN COULD NOT GO AGAINST FEMINISM WHEN THE MEDIA IS THE ONLY THING PEOPLE LISTEN TO FOR FACTS!! AND THEY WOULD SOUND SEXIST AND THE MEDIA WOULD BASHHH THEM, SILENCE THEM, USE CELEBRITY ICONS ASA TOOL TO SILENCE THEM ALONG WITH THE ALREADY FEMINIST WOMEN ON BOARD WITH 3RD WAVE FEMINISM. IT IS NOT MEN’S FAULT AT ALL AND IT IS NOT WOMEN’S FAULT AT ALL. IT IS THE MEDIA, SO CALLED FEMINIST LEADERS ( WHICH ARE FEMALES) AND CELEBRITIES WHO PUSH THE MAN-HATING 3RD WAVE OF FEMINISM. AND MIGHT I ALSO ADD IT IS AND WAS!! WOMEN WHO KEEPT AND KEEP ACCEPTING FEMINISM ALTHOUGH SOMEN MEN DO SUPPORT FEMINISM . FEMINISM IS FOR WOMEN AND IT IS MOSTLY WOMEN WHO ACCEPT 3RD WAVE FEMINISM.

        Like

    • I think Milo Yiannopoulos is very articulate and tend to agree with the points he’s made about Feminism. But in terms of listening to his other stuff, he has espoused some viewpoints that I personally find to be a bit extreme.

      Like

  3. You can’t say ” Feminism exists because men have allowed it to exist. They didn’t step forward to stop it, so now they have to deal with it” because it was female leaders who spread their idea of feminism. now I am not saying the women in general or all women created feminism again it was female leaders that spread their idea feminism.Also I am not talking about the feminism where in 1920 women got the right to vote or when women got the same job opportunities as men. I am talking about about the feminism where women had the same rights as men , but the FEMINIST WOMEN wanted power over men. actual feminism had existed before today’s dumb feminism so when actual feminism was turned around to WOMEN OVER MEN the already feminist women did not question the dumb feminism and accepted it so if men where to stand up for themselves they would be seen as sexist. so if one man stood up against feminism he would be ridiculed and become a cautionary tale. ALSO WOMEN WHO WERE ALREADY FEMINIST AND WOMEN WHO WERE NOT FEMINIST COULD HAVE SAID NO TO THE NEW MAN-HATING FEMINISM BUT NO THEY DID NOT QUESTION IT BUT ACCEPTED IT SO YOU CAN’T!!!! SAY MEN HAVE ALLOWED IT TO EXIST CAUSE WOMEN DID ALOWED FEMINISM TO EXIST. THE BLAME IS NOT WOMEN OR MEN IT IS THE FEMALES THAT BRANG THIS MAN-HATING FEMINISM!!! BUT NOT THE FEMINISM THAT GAVE WOMEN THEIR RIGHTS.

    Like

  4. Good read but after finding out you are a female, I cannot take this serious. Just another wannabe pro male feminist trying to act like a narwhal.

    You saw the big crowds seeking trp and mgtown and decided to take a bite of the cake too. Just plain opportunism and hypergamy, once an other fad comes along you will run along with it as well.

    If I’ve learned anything from mgtow and trp is to not fall for the illusion. No one does anything for no reason or for free. And women are hypergamous in nature, so this same hypergamous can bleed into other aspects of their lives.

    I’m sure you aren’t doing this for MEN, there is something else you are seeking something definitely not involving anything related to assisting men.

    Like I’ve seen from women they say something but they want the complete opposite or something else, they don’t want what they say they want.

    Nice try. Though

    Like

  5. false, its women ( the babaric female nature ) that destroys civilisations ( aka nations ).

    Maybe you should watch that grat explanation by black pigeon soeaks again, since you seem to have missed alot there.

    Like

    • This argument ignores the fact though that all great civilizations have relied on female support to function. Women are often either half, or more than half of a civilization. If they were all actively resisting the patriarchy, the said civilization would not have been able to function. Women generally benefited from the patriarchy, which is why they cooperated. They got security in exchange for cooperation. And religion and ideology played a role in getting their cooperation.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s